“The Hardest of All the Problems”

Hochman, Rodgers, and Buchanan on Pareto Optimal Redistribution

Authors

  • Daniel Kuehn The Urban Institute and George Washington University, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v15i1.658

Abstract

This paper provides a history of the development of Harold Hochman and James Rodgers’ (1969) theory of Pareto optimal redistribution, which modeled income transfers as a public good. Pareto optimal redistribution provided an economic efficiency case for redistribution policy. After reviewing the emergence of Pareto optimal redistribution at the University of Virginia and its elaboration at the Urban Institute in the early 1970s, the paper describes James M. Buchanan’s efforts to grapple with his colleague’s ideas in the context of public choice theory. Initially, Buchanan provided an even more expansive argument for redistribution than Hochman and Rodgers (1969). By the mid-1970s, though, Buchanan largely rejected his earlier approach to redistribution and theorized new criteria for redistribution that were narrower in scope.

Author Biography

Daniel Kuehn, The Urban Institute and George Washington University, United States

Daniel Kuehn is a Principal Research Associate at the Urban Institute’s Income and Benefits Policy Center and an adjunct professor at George Washington University, both in Washington, D.C., USA. He holds a PhD in Economics from American University and has published numerous articles, book chapters, and reports on the history of economics and on employment and training programs.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-15

How to Cite

Kuehn, D. (2022). “The Hardest of All the Problems”: Hochman, Rodgers, and Buchanan on Pareto Optimal Redistribution. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 15(1), 56–82. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v15i1.658